К предыдущей главе... К следующей главе...


II. The Use of Detained Individuals as Hostages: 1995-1996

       At the end of 1994, filtration points began to function in the cities of Mozdok (Northern Osetia Republic), Stavropol, Pyatigorsk (Stavropol region) and later in Grozny. These points were established as a place where those who were suspected of participation in the fighting against Russian forces or of having committed a criminal act on the territory of Chechnya could be brought. However, during the first six months of the war, there were not any normative documents which clarified the status of or regulated the activities of such filtration points.
       The arbitrary nature of the detention lead to the imprisonment of an overwhelming majority of individual citizens who had not taken part in the fighting.1
       Some of the citizens detained at the filtration points were used as hostages by the federal services of the RF. As a result, the Chechen side was, in many instances, offered people who had not participated in the fighting and who were not officials of the self-proclaimed CRI in exchange for Russian soldiers.
       For example, according to the numerous reports in the official Russian media, Djokhar Dudaev’s older brother, Bekmuza Dudaev, was detained on February 19, 1995 and brought to the Lefortovo prison in Moscow. No proof of his participation in the fighting was ever found nor was he declared to be an official of the CRI. It was simply announced that «he had a big influence on his brother».2 On April 6, 1996, it was announced that B. Dudaev was exchanged for Vyacheslav Dmitrenchenko, a major of the 22nd special assignment brigade of the CAI who had been taken prisoner on January 7th. In addition to B. Dudaev a large group of those detained at the filtration point were also offered. Before their release, however, they were required to sign a document stating that they had no claims against the management of the filtration point. Included in this group was Takhir Davletykaev, the general prosecutor of the Shelkovsky region, who refused to be exchanged and demanded that he be charged of a crime in accordance with the law. Despite his insistence, he was exchanged with the rest of the members of the group.
       According to information from Isa Madaev,3 a representative of the leadership of the armed forces of the CRI who conducted the exchange from the Chechen side, the discussion was not about Dudaev’s older brother, but rather about his younger brother, Makharbi, who had worked in Grozny as a taxi driver. Furthermore, the Chechen side insisted that he be excluded from the list of those who were to be released in that particular exchange.4 According to Madaev, this was done because Djokhar Dudaev had ordered the execution of the officer who the Russian side had been trying to exchange for his brother Makharbi.

***

       Those detained were used as hostages as well as for other reasons.
       In January 1996, Madaev was detained in a Grozny filtration point. His relatives, who approached the MIA RF in March regarding the possibilities of his release, were told that Mataev could be freed in exchange for a captured Russian soldier, but that they would have to find one themselves. The women responded that they had neither the resources nor the connections necessary to find and pay off the ransom of a captured Russian soldier. As another solution, officials of the MIA RF suggested that they find, dig up and bring in the bodies of three officers from a specific detachment of the MIA who had been killed in the course of the fighting in Grozny between March 6-8, 1996. They were also told where the bodies were buried. Earlier attempts by the Russian side to remove the bodies had been impeded by shooting in the nearby area. The women brought the bodies of two officers and the burned remains of a third to the Russians, and toward the end of March, Madaev was released.5
       According to the story of Madina Magomadova,6 officials of the MIA RF promised to release her brother, Shamsa Magomadov if she found out and provided them with information about the whereabouts of a certain captured Russian soldier. When she met those conditions, she was told that that soldier was not needed and that she should find out the whereabouts of a certain captured officer. When she presented that information, the demands again changed. To this day, her brother has not been released and no information about his whereabouts is known.
       According to materials of the Russian power structures which were made available after the taking of Grozny by Chechen forces in August 1996, there was a document prepared by officials of the FSS on July 29, 1995 «On the Whereabouts of Russian Soldiers Taken Prisoner by Illegal Military Formations». This document contains sentences similar to the following one: «On July 25, in an encounter with citizens who were interested in exchanging their own men for captured Russian soldiers, it became clear that they had recently been looking for such soldiers who could be used in an exchange.» What follows is an account of the information which these civilians obtained in the course of their searches.

***

       We have mentioned only those instances where criminal activities (blackmail or trading people) have taken place «in the name of the State». The examples are not about the release of prisoners for money, i.e. the private criminal activities of soldiers and officials of the MIA RF.



К предыдущей главе... К следующей главе...